The Comparison of the Number of Bacterial Colonies on Common Floor Surfaces versus Everyday Shoes

School Name

Heathwood Hall

Grade Level

11th Grade

Presentation Topic

Microbiology

Presentation Type

Non-Mentored

Abstract

In this experiment, the number of bacterial colonies in everyday shoes versus common floor surfaces was compared. This experiment means to provide scientific reference for determining where it is ‘cleanest’ to put one’s feet. In broader sense, specifically in underdeveloped countries, this experiment aims to increase interest in providing the right kind of shoes for those who can’t afford them based off of the amount of bacteria growing in surfaces that people come into contact with everyday. It was hypothesized that the everyday shoes would generally have a greater number of bacterial colonies than the common floor surfaces, and that the close-toed shoes would promote bacterial growth more so than the open-toed shoes. In order to perform the experiment, ten participants provided one close-toed shoe and one-open toed shoe to be swabbed for bacteria. Additionally, bacterial swabs were taken of two floor surfaces. The bacteria was observed in dehydrated nutrient agar that was dissolved in boiling water and cooled in petri dishes. The bacteria colonies were counted using the Colony Counter App on an IPhone. Overall findings supported the hypothesis: the everyday shoes generally had a greater number of bacterial colonies and the number of bacterial colonies in close-toed shoes exceeded that of open-toed shoes. The results were analyzed using several single ANOVA tests comparing different independent variables, which revealed that some comparisons had statistical significance. The overall results were displayed in column charts.

Start Date

3-25-2017 11:59 PM

Presentation Format

Written Only

Group Project

No

COinS
 
Mar 25th, 11:59 PM

The Comparison of the Number of Bacterial Colonies on Common Floor Surfaces versus Everyday Shoes

In this experiment, the number of bacterial colonies in everyday shoes versus common floor surfaces was compared. This experiment means to provide scientific reference for determining where it is ‘cleanest’ to put one’s feet. In broader sense, specifically in underdeveloped countries, this experiment aims to increase interest in providing the right kind of shoes for those who can’t afford them based off of the amount of bacteria growing in surfaces that people come into contact with everyday. It was hypothesized that the everyday shoes would generally have a greater number of bacterial colonies than the common floor surfaces, and that the close-toed shoes would promote bacterial growth more so than the open-toed shoes. In order to perform the experiment, ten participants provided one close-toed shoe and one-open toed shoe to be swabbed for bacteria. Additionally, bacterial swabs were taken of two floor surfaces. The bacteria was observed in dehydrated nutrient agar that was dissolved in boiling water and cooled in petri dishes. The bacteria colonies were counted using the Colony Counter App on an IPhone. Overall findings supported the hypothesis: the everyday shoes generally had a greater number of bacterial colonies and the number of bacterial colonies in close-toed shoes exceeded that of open-toed shoes. The results were analyzed using several single ANOVA tests comparing different independent variables, which revealed that some comparisons had statistical significance. The overall results were displayed in column charts.