Article Title

New Territories.

Authors

Newspaper Title

Detroit Free Press

Publication Date

1-6-1854

Publication Place

Detroit, Michigan

Event Topic

Nebraska Bill (Jan-May 1854)

Political Party

Democratic

Region

free state

Disclaimer

Please Note: Some editorials in this collection contain offensive language, opinions, and other content. The editorials serve as evidence of the time period in which they were created and enable us to engage in more truthful conversations about history. The views expressed in these editorials do not reflect Furman University's values or our commitment to embrace meaningful diversity and equality in all of our endeavors. If you have questions or concerns, please e-mail digitalcollections@furman.edu.

Quote

It is no part of the business of Congress to legislate for the territories.

Document Type

Article (Journal or Newsletter)

Full Text Transcription

We see it stated that the Committee on Territories in the Senate will probably report bills for the organization of three new territories, to be formed out of the territory lying between the western boundaries of Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa and Minnesota, and the Rocky Mountains, and extending north and south between the 34th and 42d parallels of north latitude. The names of these new territories, it is further reported, will be Nebraska, Kansas, and Cherokee.

It is very probable that an attempt will be made by the abolitionists in Congress to revive the slavery prohibition question, by urging the embodiament of the Wilmot proviso in the bills for the organization of these new territories; and it may be that indiscreet southern men will seek the adoption of the Missouri compromise line in the same bills.

There is but one way to get along with the question, and that is to exclude both the Wilmot proviso and the Missouri compromise from all territorial bills. The public mind of the country, we apprehend, is settled in respect to this thing -- settled upon the platform of Gen. Cass' Nicholson letter. It is no part of the business of Congress to legislate for the territories. All Congress has to do with these embryo States is, to set the machinery of their governments in motion, and the people inhabiting them will take care of the rest. If they want slavery they will have it, and vice versa, and Congress cannot help it, on the same principle that Congress could not help it should the people ofMichigan determine that slavery might exist within their borders.

We trust there will be found majorities in both houses of Congress who will promptly, and without debate, vote down all propositions, as connected with these territorial bills, relating to slavery. -- That is the only safe, it is the only democratic, disposition that can be made of them. If they are entertained, they will lead to interminable discussion, the event of which will be in no respect propitious.

Edited/Proofed by

Entered by Lloyd Benson, Proofed by Ben Barnhill,

Identifier

mifpkn540106a

Rights

This item is in the public domain, and can be used by anyone without restriction.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

Event Location

 
COinS
 

New Territories.

It is no part of the business of Congress to legislate for the territories.